Skip to main content

Introduction

Older adults account for 20% of emergency department visits in the United States.1 Older adults are commonly defined as aged 65 years and older, although some populations use lower thresholds to account for premature aging; for example, people with HIV and those with a history of incarceration are considered older adults the age of 50.2–8 Substantial efforts are underway across the United States to improve and standardize the process, experience, and outcomes of older adult emergency care. Examples include the American College of Emergency Physician’s Geriatric Emergency Department Accreditation activities and ongoing updates to the 2014 multi-organizational “Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines” using the GRADE approach to creating clinical practice guidelines.9,10 However, a scoping review of geriatric emergency medicine (EM) research from 2016-2021 found that: (1) few investigations included older adults who speak non-English primary languages, (2) inclusion of older adults from minoritized racial and ethnic groups was inconsistently reported, and (3) few investigations examined racial, gender, cognitive, or geographical disparities in geriatric emergency care.11 Despite knowledge gaps about the health and emergency care of older adults, older adults are routinely excluded from clinical research based on age, cognitive and sensory impairments, and other aging related changes.

Researchers commonly encounter barriers to including older adults in research and lack training to overcome these challenges. At the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine’s 2024 annual conference, 63 emergency medicine researchers and 12 clinician-scientists had a series of roundtable discussions about common challenges and solutions related to inclusion of older adults in emergency care research while incorporating principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Discussions focused on 5 topics based on the scoping review11 and priorities for action and education: (1) general principles for including older adults in EM research, (2) inclusion of older adults with cognitive impairment in EM research, (3) recruitment and retention of socioeconomically disadvantaged older adults, (4) ensuring a diverse research workforce, and (5) incorporating principles of equity into research budgets. Authors discussed and reviewed the notes then created a summary of key strategies for inclusion of diverse older adults in emergency care research, presented in Table 1.

Conclusion

Inclusion of older adults in research is important as we seek to provide high-quality, equitable care to ED patients across the lifespan.11,18–20 We outline common challenges and potential solutions in incorporating older adults, including those with cognitive impairment and those from minority racial and ethnic backgrounds. Intentional planning and collaboration can help address structural barriers to inclusion of diverse populations in emergency care research. As the US population ages, researchers in all fields should strive to include older adults. Geriatric emergency care researchers have unique perspectives and experiences that should be shared with other researchers. Presenting at other society meetings, contributing to journals outside of geriatric emergency medicine, and collaborating with non-geriatric emergency medicine researchers may help disseminate best practices regarding the inclusion of older adults in research.

REFERENCES

  1. Ashman J, Schappert S, Santo L. Emergency Department Visits Among Adults Aged 60 and Over: United States, 2014–2017. Natl Cent Health Stat Data Briefs. 2020;367:1-8.
  2. Age. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Published August 11, 2022. Accessed July 29, 2024. https://www.nih.gov/nih-style-guide/age
  3. Age and Sex. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Accessed July 29, 2024. https://www.cms.gov/data-research/statistics-trends-and-reports/national-health-expenditure-data/age-and-sex
  4. Sankar A, Nevedal A, Neufeld S, Berry R, Luborsky M. What do we know about older adults and HIV? a review of social and behavioral literature. AIDS Care. 2011;23(10):1187-1207. doi:10.1080/09540121.2011.564115
  5. Emlet CA, Farkas KJ. A descriptive analysis of older adults with HIV/AIDS in California. Health Soc Work. 2001;26(4):226-234. doi:10.1093/hsw/26.4.226
  6. Curran JW, Morgan WM, Hardy AM, Jaffe HW, Darrow WW, Dowdle WR. The epidemiology of AIDS: current status and future prospects. Science. 1985;229(4720):1352-1357. doi:10.1126/science.2994217
  7. Williams BA, Lindquist K, Sudore RL, Strupp HM, Willmott DJ, Walter LC. Being old and doing time: functional impairment and adverse experiences of geriatric female prisoners. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(4):702-707. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00662.x
  8. Noren Hooten N, Pacheco NL, Smith JT, Evans MK. The accelerated aging phenotype: The role of race and social determinants of health on aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;73:101536. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101536
    10/17/2024 Topic Supplement 6 | Page © Advocate Health 2024
  9. Kennedy M, Lesser A, Israni J, et al. Reach and Adoption of a Geriatric Emergency Department Accreditation Program in the United States. Ann Emerg Med. 2022;79(4):367-373. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.06.013
  10. Ko K, Lesser A, Biese K, Hwang U, Carpenter C. The Journey Of Geriatric Emergency Medicine: Acceleration, Diffusion, And Collaboration As Keys To Continued Growth. Accessed July 30, 2024. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20170912.061810/full/
  11. Chary AN, Suh M, Ordoñez E, et al. A scoping review of geriatric emergency medicine research transparency in diversity, equity, and inclusion reporting. J Am Geriatr Soc. Published online July 12, doi:10.1111/jgs.190521
  12. Hunold KM, Goldberg EM, Caterino JM, et al. Inclusion of older adults in emergency department clinical research: Strategies to achieve a critical goal. Acad Emerg Med. 2022;29(3):376-383. doi:10.1111/acem.14386
  13. Prusaczyk B, Cherney SM, Carpenter CR, DuBois JM. Informed Consent to Research with Cognitively Impaired Adults: Transdisciplinary Challenges and Opportunities. Clin Gerontol. 2017;40(1):63-73. doi:10.1080/07317115.2016.1201714
  14. Carpenter CR, McFarland F, Avidan M, et al. Impact of Cognitive Impairment Across Specialties: Summary of a Report From the U13 Conference Series. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(10):2011-2017. doi:10.1111/jgs.16093
  15. Noren Hooten N, Pacheco NL, Smith JT, Evans MK. The accelerated aging phenotype: The role of race and social determinants of health on aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;73:101536. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101536
  16. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can. 2005;173(5):489-495. doi:10.1503/cmaj.050051
  17. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-383. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
  18. Vaughan CP, Dale W, Allore HG, et al. AGS Report on Engagement Related to the NIH Inclusion Across the Lifespan Policy. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(2):211-217. doi:10.1111/jgs.15784
  19. Lundebjerg NE, Medina-Walpole AM. Future forward: AGS initiative addressing intersection of structural racism and ageism in health care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(4):892-895. doi:10.1111/jgs.17053
  20. Farrell TW, Hung WW, Unroe KT, et al. Exploring the intersection of structural racism and ageism in healthcare. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022;70(12):3366-3377. doi:10.1111/jgs.18105